Our Diary

We’ve left it open for you, so you don’t even need one of those little keys. Because writing is life, and keeping it real means forgoing the line between the personal and the professional.

Contact Us Today for a
Free Consultation

Clients Crushin’ It: Lois Kelly

Madison Utley speaks to Lois Kelly following the release of her book, Slow Loss: A Memoir of Marriage Undone by Disease, about the emotional and intellectual impact of transitioning from business to personal material, the reader responses she has gotten so far, and what a commitment to the daily practice of writing has brought–and will continue to bring–to her creative life. 

 

 

MU: To start, can you walk me through your overall writing journey?

LK: From a young age, I wanted to be a journalist. I started writing for Boston area newspapers when I was 15. I would report on obituaries, weddings, and human interest stories. Those I especially loved because I could ask people questions and learn different things. I loved the concept of writing as exploration like that. Curiosity is really what drives me. 

My business books that I wrote first were an exploration of trends I was seeing, trying to understand: why is that happening?. Then again, much later on, my memoir is me exploring what I was going through and trying to use my journalism skills to document it, with some sense of compassion and curiosity. 

I sort of lost my way with writing for many years. I got into the corporate world and I wrote speeches for CEOs and I did public relations and marketing; I was good at it and it helped me make a living, but that was such unfulfilling writing for me. When I would get an idea about a book, that was so satisfying. Like a meal where you just don’t want to leave the table because everything is so good. Whereas the business writing in the corporate world was like necessary sustenance. It wasn’t feasting.  

 

MU: Can you talk to me about the differences you’ve felt between business and personal writing, having done so much of both? 

LK: About 14 years ago I wrote a book called Be the Noodle about how to be a compassionate, courageous, crazy good caregiver. It was a sweet, little book that people still love. That was my first personal work. It was somewhat difficult because you’re exposing yourself. To write anything good, you must be vulnerable. That was frightening. I didn’t feel so comfortable with that, yet I knew if I didn’t fully show up, then it wouldn’t be interesting writing. The story would be dull and the character might be unlikable.

Buddhist monk Thích Nhất Hạnh once said, “How you live is your message to the world.” Much of my writing is about being courageous, resilient, and realistically optimistic, even in dark times. That is my message. (But please, no toxic positivity!)

 

MU: What led you to seek editorial help with your memoir, and what do you feel like was gained from looping Stuart in? 

LK: That wise, experienced, outside perspective is absolutely fundamental for making something as good as it can be. When you’re writing, you get so close to the material you can no longer see. If you want it to be really good, you need a great editor. And to me, if I’m going to do something, I’m going to make it the best it can be. I want it to be a gift to the reader. 

I remember the first thing I said to Stuart: “You need to tell me if this manuscript is something that was good for my own self healing or if there is a book in it. And please be frank with me.” I had been in a writer’s group for four years by that point and I had seen that some things we write are for our own healing or growth and development, and not necessarily something to be shared. I would have been fine if Stuart said it read like a self healing exercise. Through writing it I got to a much better place, so that was fantastic in and of itself. I was just so close to it and there was so much trauma and change and wildness, that Stuart telling me it was a book and helping me go from there was really valuable. 

 

MU: What kind of reader responses have you gotten thus far?

LK: The memoir has been out for just a few weeks, so it’s early days, but people are saying it’s stunning, it’s heartbreaking, it’s full of love, it’s hopeful, and that the dark humor grounds it. The feedback has been really beautiful. I almost cried when one woman wrote to me: “No one gets what this is really like. This is a gift to the legions of unrecognized caregivers.” It invited us to have a really interesting conversation about ourselves and our suffering and how dealing with this has shaped us. I’m hoping the book invites people to have much more honest conversations with others in their lives–even with their doctors who sometimes are very good clinically but maybe don’t fully understand the emotional impacts of long diseases on patients and their loved ones. 

There are all these people out there who are bettering the world in big, obvious ways–like neurosurgeons–whom I so admire. I hope that with my writing, I better the world in at least a teeny, tiny way. 

 

MU: I ask this understanding your memoir hasn’t even been out for a month yet, so forgive me, but do you have any idea what’s next for your writing?

LK: I’ve been writing these essays where I’m looking at business things again but writing about them in a fun new way. They’re about what I’ve learned, what I wish I had done better when I was an inexperienced, insecure manager. I don’t know where they’re going, but it’s really fun to write them–and to write them outside of any business style, much more creatively than I’ve done that kind of writing before. Sometimes it’s just fun to write without having any expectations at all and then after a while, you begin to see something to explore in a more disciplined, organized way. Every book I’ve done, that’s how it’s started: Maybe there’s something here, I’m going to let the ideas grow and then we’ll see. 

 

MU: Do you have any advice you’d like to share with other writers?

LK: The first thing is to write every day. It’s such a fun practice, but it’s also a discipline just like running or yoga. You write if you want to be a writer. I have a group on Zoom and we meet for an hour every day; we start with 10 minutes of meditation and then there’s a prompt if you want, but you can take it or leave it. Writing daily is so satisfying, and I’m becoming a better writer for it. After a while you start to see a pattern, you begin to get these little pearls, and you’re like: “Oh, that’s what’s going on here.” You’re not going to use them all, but you begin to get some great material. It’s habit and routine, yes, but it’s also fun and light and easy versus ugh, I have to sit down and get this done. It’s a safe place to experiment and play. Having a community supporting that is really helpful and holds you accountable too. 

The second thing, and I have to credit Stuart for this, is that I’m not a traditional writer. Some writing in my memoir skews poetic and then some chapters are more traditional prose. The pace of the reading, the energy of it, works for me. I asked Stuart, “Can I do this with a kind of mixed style, outside of what a classic literary memoir is?” Stuart said to me, “You can do anything you want.” It was the greatest advice I got. It built my confidence and it liberated me. And it makes sense too because, when you look at it, the traditional ways of doing anything are being shaken up. There are fundamentals of storytelling, of course, but how you deliver it should be outside of formulas. So as Stuart told me, I’d in turn urge other writers not to be imprisoned by formulas. 

BA Presents: The Phase One Contest


At Book Architecture, editorial support often begins with a Phase One (as the name might indicate), and
 that is what this contest is all about.

What is a Phase One?

If you are selected as the winner, Madison and I will each review your manuscript and generate a 7-10 page long written critique, capturing the macro and micro issues within your material. Once you have received and digested these critiques, a 1.5 to 2-hour meeting with all of us will help clarify any questions and brainstorm your next steps. (More information on the entire Book Architecture process can be found here).

What is our motivation?

Believe it or not…to be of help. Maybe you keep thinking your work is ready but you can’t bring yourself to actually enlist editorial help; maybe you’re ready and willing to involve that aid but your cash flow is holding you back for now; maybe you just like winning. In any case, we hope to see your manuscript in the draw!

What do we need from you?

  • A 10-page sample from anywhere in the work. (Microsoft Word, Apple’s Pages, or PDF are our preferred formats, but try us with other ones).
  • We hate synopses as much as anyone, so in addition to your sample we simply ask for one paragraph on what the work is about and where you (think you) are with it.

How does it work?

Submissions can be sent here, with an October 1st deadline. Entries will be judged by three members of the Inkhouse executive team, who are, in the words of one of them, “stoked” to assist. (If you’re not familiar, Inkhouse is a public relations firm with offices in Boston, San Francisco, New York, Seattle, San Diego, and Washington DC). What are their judging criteria? It’s very simple — they will be looking for potential.

Make sure to sign up for the BA newsletter if you haven’t already, as that’s where the winner will be announced at the end of October. (And that could be you!)

Dear Desk Sitter

It is simply the reality that many of us spend 8+ hours a day sitting at our desks. Here at Book Architecture, we were discussing what can be done to mitigate the bodily wear and tear of that fact earlier this month. We bandied about some of the tips and tricks we think we maybe heard were helpful somewhere? before realizing it was time to consult a professional. Below is what physical therapist Dr. Mat Parker told Madison when she asked, on all of our behalf, what can be done: 

Motion is lotion. 

If you retain just one thing after reading this, Dr. Parker wants it to be that humans are made to move. You can sit with the most ideal posture on a multi-thousand dollar ergonomic chair with an optimally elevated screen, and even cumulatively that won’t be as impactful as taking mini breaks from being at your desk altogether. If you can swing it, he recommends moving around for five minutes every hour. 

Less is more when it comes to products. 

The type of chair you’re sitting on matters so much less than how you’re sitting on it. What we should be aiming for, according to Dr. Parker, is the 90-90-90 rule. Essentially, with your feet resting comfortably on the ground, your ankles should make a 90 degree angle, your knees should make a 90 degree angle, and your hips should make a nice 90 degree angle. If your feet don’t reach the ground but are dangling, that puts more pressure on the spine, and a footrest or foot stool might be a good idea–but really, that’s all. 

The biggest mistake Dr. Parker reports seeing is people, especially those with a history of back pain, opting for too much back support in their work setup. This can actually increase the curvature of the spine, forcing spinal muscles to activate and fire all day long, creating pain rather than alleviating it. Instead, when you’re sitting, you should ideally be straight up and down, with your low back gently resting against your chair or against a very small low back rest, with your back muscles relaxed and jelly-like. 

Check in with your body regularly. 

While we’re aiming for 90-90-90, people slouch. They sit on their feet. They cross their ankles. According to Dr. Parker, that’s fine. Don’t sweat it. Just make sure you don’t get so in the workflow that you hold the same suboptimal posture for too long. It’s important to switch it up. Even if you have a standing desk, for example, it’s best to alternate between that and sitting. If it doesn’t seem realistic to aim for the five minutes of movement per hour recommended above, these body scans and micro adjustments still carry a lot of value. 

Targeted effort goes far. 

If you want to take things a bit further, however, Dr. Parker says that working on hip mobility and glute strength is very beneficial for someone who sits for most of their work day. When people experience back pain or tightness, they often assume their core is weak and what needs to be strengthened. It is actually glutes that are the bigger issue. Dr. Parker describes it as their being the foundation to your house; if the foundation is rocky and unsteady, the columns of your spine are taking on force they’re not designed to. 

A hip flexor stretch is a great place to start to combat this. If you want to get fancy with it, you can add in some glute exercises like squats or glute bridges. Youtube videos can help guide these efforts–just take care not to let the glut of fitness videos therein overwhelm you.  

It’s an awareness game.

The true challenge is that when people are locked into work, or writers have found the flow, people tend to float off the back of their chair and inch closer to the computer screen–and there they might stay, for hours on end. According to Dr. Parker, “You want my annoying voice in the back of your head reminding you, ‘I haven’t moved in a few minutes. I should probably change positions.” At the end of the day, this is really all an awareness game.

8 (More) Albums for the Inspired Writer

When we first ran 10 Albums for the Inspired Writer, we were surprised by how much positive feedback we received. Help with the nuts and bolts of writing is apparently very welcome. The idea was to share music that could be used in the background while you write — a highly individualized choice, of course, but at the same time, aren’t we always looking for new music?

And so, I bring you eight more of my favorite wordless or foreign language albums (that don’t gum up the verbal faculty with lyrics, as that faculty is being used for something else) along with some notes on what kinds of projects they might be best suited for.


 

Bear’s Sonic Journals: That Which Colors the Mind by Ali Akbar Khan. A 2 hr.-concert performed by Ali Akbar Khan, master of the sarod (a Hindustani stringed instrument, as popular as the sitar). At the height of the 60’s era, Khan gave a concert in San Francisco that was recorded by the Grateful Dead’s Sound Engineer, Owsley “Bear” Stanley. Yes, the same Owsley who made the era’s best LSD. Suffice it to say, no one at this concert was asking Khan to stop.

>> You might also try: Raga Sindhi Bhairavi also by Ali Akbar Khan. The only disadvantage? The ragas — and hence the semi-trance periods the may provide — are shorter.

 


 


Live in Paris 28.05.1976 by Robert Fripp and Brian Eno. A two and a half hour guitar and synthesizer concert that feels five hours long, in a good way. You hear people clapping, someone getting yelled at (I think, it’s all in French), but soundscapes are 98% of this experience. You might try this when you really need to clear away all distractions.

>> You might also try: Thursday Afternoon by Brian Eno. The first time I put it on a playlist, I didn’t realize this “song” would be an hour long. Then it came on and everything became Thursday afternoon, and that turned out to be a good time to get a lot of work done.

 


 

Midnight Blue by Kenny Burrell. We need some jazz in here, so how about this album straight from the middle of the genre’s golden era (if you ask me). Burrell speaking through his Gibson L-5 (nickname: “Midnight Blue”) might encourage you to hear your own voice as he explores a range of emotions.

>> You might also try: Grant Green Ain’t It Funky Now: The Original Jam Master (Vol. 1) by Grant Green. More jazz guitar, this time just as it is edging into funk and soul. The grooves are a little more infectious and nobody’s giving up on an idea too soon.

 


Melhdau Covers: Surprise! An actual Spotify playlist here of the pianist Brad Mehldau’s sophisticated covers of popular songs. You will recognize these tunes, or small sections of them, so this entry might work if you want to be set forth to dream, on the one hand, but need a touchstone as you work through some murky territory, on the other.

>> You might also try: Mon Chien Stupide, Melhdau’s score for a French “comedy-drama” film (2019). I never saw the movie, but the album itself hints at a beginning, middle and end, a reversal and a denouement — all the good stuff without having to learn someone else’s narrative while working on your own.